In private beta
Sample Decision Log

See how Claima explains a fit signal.

This synthetic example shows how a funding signal is traced to its source, broken into criteria, checked against available evidence, and left with an accountant-owned next action.

Synthetic fixture · not a real customer
  • Northwind Robotics Ltd is a synthetic fixture used only to illustrate how Claima explains a fit signal.
  • It is not a real Claima customer.
  • It is not a pilot.
  • It is not a case study.
  • It must not be cited as proof of customer traction.
Company fixture

Northwind Robotics Ltd

The synthetic company used throughout this worked example. Substituting a real client name into this page is not authorised.

Company · fixtureSynthetic fixture
Company
Northwind Robotics Ltd
Company type
UK SME
Sector
Robotics / advanced manufacturing
Stage
Early commercial / R&D-active
Scheme fixture

Innovate UK Smart Grants R22

The synthetic scheme read for this worked example. The overall signal is a summary; the seven criteria below carry the detail.

Scheme · fixtureSynthetic fixture
Scheme
Innovate UK Smart Grants R22
Source
Innovate UK Funding Service
Date read
2026-05-12
Overall signal
Appears to match
Evidence state
Evidence needed
Uncertainty
Accountant review required
How to read this log

Every fit signal, decomposed into criteria.

A fit signal is never a single verdict. Claima decomposes each signal into the criteria the funder published, and the table below walks through each criterion in turn.

Each criterion carries its own source, date-read, signal label, reasoning, evidence state, uncertainty, and accountant next action. The same trail Claima sees is the trail the accountant sees.

The accountant owns every next action. Claima organises and explains; it does not authorise a client-facing claim.

Worked example

Seven criteria. Seven traced rows.

Each row below shows one criterion from the synthetic scheme, with its source, date-read, cautious signal label, the reasoning behind that label, the current evidence state, the remaining uncertainty, and the accountant-owned next action.

  1. Applicant type

    Appears to match
    Source
    Companies House / fixture profile
    Date read
    2026-05-12
    Reasoning
    Northwind appears to be a UK SME based on the fixture profile.
    Evidence state
    Ready
    Uncertainty
    accountant confirmation required
    Next action
    Verify company details
  2. Innovation project fit

    Evidence needed
    Source
    Innovate UK Funding Service
    Date read
    2026-05-12
    Reasoning
    The project appears R&D-active, but the technical novelty narrative is not yet evidenced.
    Evidence state
    Evidence needed
    Uncertainty
    technical narrative missing
    Next action
    Collect missing evidence
  3. Project cost eligibility

    Potential gap
    Source
    Innovate UK Funding Service
    Date read
    2026-05-12
    Reasoning
    Eligible cost categories are not fully mapped from the fixture.
    Evidence state
    Evidence needed
    Uncertainty
    cost category mapping incomplete
    Next action
    Review ambiguous criteria
  4. Source freshness

    Source stale
    Source
    Innovate UK Funding Service
    Date read
    2026-05-12
    Reasoning
    The source must be re-read before any live use.
    Evidence state
    source refresh required
    Uncertainty
    source may have changed
    Next action
    Re-read source
  5. Ambiguous criterion

    Reviewer action required
    Source
    Innovate UK Funding Service
    Date read
    2026-05-12
    Reasoning
    One criterion needs human interpretation before the signal can be relied on.
    Evidence state
    reviewer note not public
    Uncertainty
    interpretation required
    Next action
    Review ambiguous criteria
  6. Subsidy / stack interaction

    Stack check needed
    Source
    fixture award history
    Date read
    2026-05-12
    Reasoning
    Prior award history may affect treatment.
    Evidence state
    prior funding record needed
    Uncertainty
    subsidy / stack position unresolved
    Next action
    Perform stack / subsidy check
  7. Unassessed item

    Not assessed
    Source
    fixture evidence file
    Date read
    2026-05-12
    Reasoning
    Environmental impact criterion has not been assessed from available fixture evidence.
    Evidence state
    Not assessed
    Uncertainty
    assessment not yet performed
    Next action
    Decide whether to continue

Synthetic example · no real client identity

Evidence state

What evidence is ready, missing, or not assessed.

Evidence Vault state for this synthetic fixture.

  • Company registration evidenceReady
  • Project summaryEvidence needed
  • Technical novelty narrativeEvidence needed
  • Budget breakdownEvidence needed
  • Prior funding recordEvidence needed
  • R&D activity evidenceEvidence needed
  • Environmental impact evidenceNot assessed
Source & date read

Source-traced and date-stamped.

Every signal in the worked example traces to a named funder source and a date the source was read. Source dates matter; a stale source is not a live source.

Source panel
Source name
Innovate UK Funding Service
Source type
Live application source
Date read
2026-05-12
Refresh status
Within cadence for the synthetic example; ‘Source stale’ shown as row-level label in the table
Source caveat
Source dates matter; a stale source means no action without a refresh.

Reminder — UKRI Gateway to Research is research intelligence about projects already funded. It is structurally separate from live application sources and never carries an ‘apply’ affordance, anywhere on Claima.

Accountant next action

Six next actions. All accountant-owned.

Every row in the worked example carries one of these six accountant-owned next actions. The accountant decides which next action to take and when.

  1. Verify company details
  2. Collect missing evidence
  3. Re-read source
  4. Review ambiguous criteria
  5. Perform stack / subsidy check
  6. Decide whether to continue

The accountant owns the next action. Claima explains the signal; it does not make the funding decision.

What this log does not do

The shape of the log is the shape of the boundary.

  • It does not say the company qualifies.
  • It does not replace funder criteria.
  • It does not replace accountant judgement.
  • It does not submit an application.
  • It does not generate a Funding Pack.
  • It does not expose reviewer notes.
  • It does not export internal audit logs.
  • It does not guarantee funding.
CLAIMA.AI / PRIVATE BETA
In private beta — invitations limited

Want to see how Claima explains a fit signal in your own practice?

We’re speaking with a small number of accountants and advisers before opening access more widely.

See also: Trust · About · Privacy · Security · Terms